Is there anything in it for credit card companies to reduce my interest rate?

I'm in the process of paying down my debt and it would be nice to do it at a more reasonable interest rate. Basically all of my cards are in the 20% range and i've been told you can negotiate a better rate. My score is in the mid-600's and all accounts are in good standing. Does anybody have any history of successful negotiation in a similar situation, and if so what's in it for the company to do so?

If you had good credit you could get a card with a 0% (or very low) balance transfer….I don't think a mid-600s FICO score will qualify you for such a card. I think that you have to have a decent score to have a good bargaining position….i.e. If you have a 720 score with balances like you have at 20% interest, you can write a friendly letter to your banks telling them that you will happily balance transfer and close out the accounts if they cannot offer a more competitive interest rate.

With your FICO score it's tricky….If you call them and request a reduced rate…the card company could panic and close your account and/or raise your rate.

CCCS can reduce rates….but this involves being involved in their debt management program and this has some negative factors…..like you have to cut up your cards….Also, your credit report will be updated to show that you are in a credit counseling program and this can greatly affect your ability to get a mortgage or car loan.

If you don't plan on getting a mortgage or car loan in the future, CCCS might be one option to pay your debt down.

STAY AWAY from any debt reduction service you see advertised on TV.

What are the odds of negotiation my debts – detail included?

Hello,

Without assigning blame for the past, here is where my spouse and I are at, and here is the situation.

Current Credit Score 710 -Trans Union

In December 2006 We enrolled in Credit Card Counseling:
December 2006 Credit Card Debt = $69,257
Current Credit Card Debt = $35,318
PMT = $1530 per month
Average Interest Rate = 9%

Mortgage = $169,483.56
interest= 7.55%
PMT =$1222 without Escrow $1457 with Escrow
Value = Estimated at $130 in this market.

Situation

Contract at work changed = Various decreases over 2009 growing to a negative $1400 per month reduction by year end.

Unplanned third child coming in July = $550 estimated monthly cost increase.

Second Job obtained = $777 per month increase

Total Net income monthly deficit by year end = $1,173.

We have approached both the Credit Card Counseling Company and the Mortgage Company and provided them all of the details, tax returns, w2's ect. I have provided them documentation of the details of my forecast.

What do you think I might be able to renegotiate with the House and the Credit Card companies. We have never missed either payment. We are alright at the moment, just saving money bracing for the summer and fall. Our goal is to be in a position to remain current, keep the house and pay down the debts.
Judy, you did not answer the question?

I don't know how much this will help you but you actually have a decent credit rating, have you thought of lowering your house payment by getting a lower interest rate by refinancing your mortgage. It could free up monthly income to reduce credit card debt

Who will defend auto workers if they don’t do it themselves?

In the face of this unprecedented attack, the UAW has continued to maintain its silence. There is little doubt that the union bureaucracy has already agreed to all of the concessions demands involving the wages, benefits and working conditions of the almost 90,000 UAW members at GM and Chrysler. This would be in line with its decades-long policy of labor-management “partnership,” in which the UAW has given up most of the gains won in generations of struggle. The only real concern of the UAW is the tens of billions owed by GM and Chrysler to its retiree health care trust fund, which the union bureaucracy had counted on as a lucrative source of investment revenue to offset the income losses resulting from the loss of two-thirds of its dues-paying membership.

Behind the scenes the union bureaucracy is in intense negotiations with the White House over what it can gain from the carve-up of the auto industry and its collaboration in the brutal exploitation of auto workers. This includes a major ownership stake in the “new” auto companies, whose share values would presumably rise sharply after they dispensed with their pension obligations and other debts and had secured a sweetheart contract from the UAW.

Among those included on Obama’s auto task force is Ron Bloom, a former partner at the Wall Street investment firm Lazard Freres & Co. Bloom has worked for the United Steelworkers bureaucracy since 1996, advising the union as it collaborated with various billionaire asset strippers during the dismantling of the steel industry.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/apr2009/auto-a16.shtml

No one. The workers are on their own. The sad part is that they have very little options. They can strike, but many won't out of fear of losing what small bit of security (health care, semi decent wage) they have. They have been sold out by everyone, even their own leaders. If all workers, union and non union could pull together for just one week, we could shut this country down. I believe that is what is needed.

Please send me your thoughts on going into a credit negotiation program.?

What about those over exposed credit companies that promise you to eliminate your credit card debt by entering thier credit negotiation program? Seems to me that you put your life and credit history in their hands with no garantee. Anyone has participated? I have "mid sized"credit card debt BUT no bad credit. Pay ontime. Only Problem: monthly payments are killing me. What is the truth on dealing directly with credit card companies?? Please, can anybody share ideas and experience? Tks
Yes, I do have an option to offset some of the debt by using my savings. I was always told not "to put good money into old bad money". Going with these debt negotiation program , I thought, would preserve my savings. I do like your answers. It is indeed helping me to make up my mind. Tks a lot

It sounds to me like you don't need to go there. I have never done that, BUT I've heard that it's pretty nasty to your credit. I don't know, I may be thinking of something else. I mean, I don't know your credit history, situation, etc, but if you have debt and pay on time every month, then the credit card companies should LOVE you. I mean, that's exactly what they want – people who owe them money AND pay it.
Go find one of those low interest rate cards, or maybe one of those with a 0% intro interest rate for 6 months, or a year, or whatever – the longer the better – and do a balance transfer. Call up your credit card company – tell them you need to close the account because the interest rate is too high. You really want to research your other options, make sure there is a better rate and that you can get the card first. But I know whenever I try to close a credit card account, especially when you've been with them a while and pay on time, etc – they will definitely try to sweeten the deal to get you to stay.
PS – any time you do a balance transfer – leave that account the hell alone. Don't touch it – just make your payment.. The order things are paid off when you send in your monthly bill is wonky, and not in your favor. Oh and after your intro rate is over, you can go apply for a new card with a good intro rate and roll the balance again. It requires more work on your end, but it totally works.

Why do we let Greedy Capitalists own our Livelihoods?

Tribune Company files for bankruptcy
By Kristina Betinis and Alexander Fangmann
15 December 2008
World Socialist Web Site

On Monday, December 8, the Tribune Company, which employs about 16,000 workers, became the first major news company to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the current economic downturn. The filing, which threatens the jobs, wages and pensions of thousands of workers, allows the company to stop paying interest on its $12.9 billion in debt and enter into debt restructuring negotiations with its creditors. The bankruptcy filing lists the company’s assets at $7.6 billion

The Tribune Company is a media empire comprising the Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, the Baltimore Sun, the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel, the Orlando Sentinel, at least 6 other daily newspapers, a cable network, a radio station, 24 television stations, several weekly papers, Chicago Magazine, and numerous websites. It also owns the Chicago Cubs and their stadium, Wrigley Field, which are not listed as part of the bankruptcy filing.

At court hearings last Wednesday, the media conglomerate asked a bankruptcy judge for permission to cut employee severance payments and health care benefits. In 1986, the Chicago Tribune smashed a bitter strike by pressmen and other craft unions, replacing 1,000 workers with strikebreakers. Today, the entire conglomerate is mostly non-union.

Many media companies are suffering from dwindling advertising revenue, as well as the loss of readers to the Internet. In another recent sign of the downsizing and consolidation of the industry, the Detroit Free Press, owned by Gannett Co, and its partner, the Detroit News, are planning to end home delivery on all but the most lucrative days, which are Thursday, Friday and Sunday.

The most direct cause of the Tribune Company’s bankruptcy, however, is the company’s staggering level of debt. Several large media companies, including Media General and Gannett, face enormous debt payments and may soon find themselves in a similar situation.

Last year’s privatization of the Tribune Company bears the marks of leveraged debt financing characteristic of the recent climate of rampant speculation.

In December 2007, billionaire real estate mogul Samuel Zell, nicknamed the “Grave Dancer” for his history of buying distressed or undervalued businesses, completed the transaction to take the Tribune Company private. He was estimated by Forbes in 2008 to be the 68th richest American. Zell, the Tribune Company’s chairman and CEO, pursued a heavily leveraged buyout of the company which was widely characterized as extremely risky and indicative of the irresponsible investments leading up to the recent crisis. The Wall Street Journal reports that “no one thought the buyout of Tribune Co. would work—and it didn’t.”

Ruthlessness typifies Zell’s approach. Speaking on the mortgage crisis at the Milken Institute Global Conference in April, Zell was quoted as saying, “This country needs a cleansing. We need to clean out all those people who never should have bought in the first place, and not give them sympathy.”

Zell maintained he could make the Tribune Company deal profitable through a combination of asset sales and reorganization to take place under the new management team, which had little or no experience in the newspaper industry. Senior executives knew that bankruptcy would likely be filed soon, in an effort to protect investments.

While Zell invested $315m of personal equity, with substantial risk mitigated by tax breaks, debt was piled on to the company in the acquisition process. By the time of its completion, Zell’s deal had saddled the Tribune Company with $11.2 billion in debt.

Most of the risk for the Tribune Company’s enormous debt was pushed onto the newly-created Employee Stock Ownership Program, which purchased $250 million worth of newly issued stocks upon being established in 2007. These schemes, promoted by the union bureaucracy to “save” failing companies, while securing the interests of big investors, have produced nothing but disaster for workers. This was the case at United Air Lines, McLouth Steel and other companies where workers lost their pensions, wages and life savings when the so-called worker-owned companies collapsed.

The Tribune ESOP, as the majority shareholder, assumed most of the risk for the debts. Those employee shareholders are also at the end of the line of creditors in the bankruptcy proceedings. Speaking to the Chicago Tribune, Zell admitted it was likely that the employee stock owners could have their holdings wiped out. The Chicago Tribune reported that Tribune Company “will halt all severance payments, deferred compensation and other payments to former employees, who will be required to file a claim with the bankruptcy court.”

The executive director of the National Center for Employee Ownership published an analysis of the Tribune Company’s ESOP in 2007 which included the following:
The executive director of the National Center for Employee Ownership published an analysis of the Tribune Company’s ESOP in 2007 which included the following: “In the Tribune case, the ESOP will borrow money from the company. Regardless of how the plan acquires stock, company contributions to the trust are tax-deductible, within certain limits. So in this case, the company is able to use the ESOP to borrow money and repay it in pretax dollars, deducting both principal and interest. This is one of the key tax benefits that the many articles on this transaction are referencing.”

In this case, as in other cases, an ESOP was established as part of the privatization to provide tax advantages and risk protection to Zell and company, rather than provide security for employees through ownership stakes, which clearly confirms the predatory nature of the Zell acquisition.
n the first eight months after the Zell acquisition of the Tribune Company, more than 900 Chicago Tribune jobs were eliminated. Compounding the instability posed by the risky acquisition, the Tribune Company continued to see its advertising revenue fall sharply. In an effort to cut costs, the Chicago Tribune introduced a smaller, reformatted paper in September of this year, composed of fifty percent advertisements and fifty percent graphics-intensive reporting. The cost cuts were achieved by reducing news content and the staff required to produce it, which could be printed on fewer pages. By August 2008, increased layoffs, employee buyouts, and other cost-cutting measures failed to reverse the company’s decline.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/dec2008/trib-d15.shtml

Jim,

Workers everywhere are taking it on the chin through no fault of their own. The capitalist is nothing but a leech on the working class. Capitalism is class warfare. The capitalist gets richer and richer as labor works harder and harder for less and less, as his benefits are slashed and his job "offshored" to cheap labor locations.

If you had read this article, Zell's recklessness lies at the foundation of ruin for the employees of Tribune Co.

"The ongoing debate over the auto bailout has demonstrated the conspiracy of the automakers, the two big business parties and the UAW against the autoworkers. All insist that workers must pay for a crisis that they did not cause, in order to restore the auto companies to profitability so they can once again be a lucrative source of income for corporate executives and big investors who are responsible for the financial catastrophe."

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/dec2008/auto-d12.shtml

Cowboy,

Read the posted article!

Im not gonna read your crazy jargon, but your question is fraudalent from the start. Yes, there are greedy capitalists, but this not necessiarly a bad thing. Afterall, they cannot steal your wealth through force or coercion, everything they do is on a voluntary basis. Only the government has the power to force you do something you dont want to do.

Businesss fail, this a part of nature, its like natural selection, those who aren't able to please customers or make good products, go bamkrupt. ANd were all better off because of it. Stop listening to to Obama, just say No To NoBama.

What does it mean to attach a bank account?

I owe approx 25k on an unsecured loan. I am unable to pay the minimum payment. I have offered the company a smaller minimum payment but the company states that's unacceptable. Due to a financial hardship/emergency (loss of a job due to job closing), my husband and I can't pay the amount that they want.

Now, we're unable to pay the minimum. We know with this amount of debt, they will send us to court eventually. In our state, there is no wage garnishment. However, we're concerned about them attaching a bank account and what the entails.

If we were to go to court, could we negotiate a payment? Right now, they will not negotiate. They offered a settlement payment, but they wanted like 4 installments of 1000+ dollars. We can't pay the minimum so of course we can't pay that. We're current on all of our other bills.

So…my questions:
*What does it mean to "Attach a bank account"?
*Can a negotiation be made eventually/settlement for lesser payment amount and/or debt amount?
*Is there any hope?

Call into the Dave Ramsey show. He is brilliant! I think that "attach a bank account" means that they can draw from your account the amount due on the due date. I WOULD NEVER GIVE MY BANK ACCOUNT TO A CREDITOR! There is hope, even if that means you have to go to court. If they settle against you in court you will make payments through the court system. Call dave ramsey.

What does it mean to attach a bank account?

I owe approx 25k on an unsecured loan. I am unable to pay the minimum payment. I have offered the company a smaller minimum payment but the company states that's unacceptable. Due to a financial hardship/emergency (loss of a job due to job closing), my husband and I can't pay the amount that they want.

Now, we're unable to pay the minimum. We know with this amount of debt, they will send us to court eventually. In our state, there is no wage garnishment. However, we're concerned about them attaching a bank account and what the entails.

If we were to go to court, could we negotiate a payment? Right now, they will not negotiate. They offered a settlement payment, but they wanted like 4 installments of 1000+ dollars. We can't pay the minimum so of course we can't pay that. We're current on all of our other bills.

So…my questions:
*What does it mean to "Attach a bank account"?
*Can a negotiation be made eventually/settlement for lesser payment amount and/or debt amount?
*Is there any hope?

"attaching a bank account" means going into your bank account without your permission (through a court order) to get payment.

You can always try negotiating. Get some professional help with it if you can. The worst that can happen is they'll say no.

There's always hope.

(could you accept the settlement…and sell something valuable to come up with payment?)

Can your company’s accounts be frozen for personal debt?

I've been fighting a judgement lost by default as the attorney was in negotiations with me and was going to settle, then he proceeded to court without my knowledge. He sued me personally, but my company whom I am part of is an llc. They are trying to hold be liable for a contract signed with a vendor 6 months before I was on the project. Now they just froze my company funds. Yet they didn't sue the company and I am not an officer. I am the designer. My husband is CEO and it is just a small operation, with six employees. My children are the other "board members". I am fighting the original judgement and am trying to get it thrown out because of his business ethics. Right now we can't operate because all our funds are frozen. His exwife was my client and I think she couldn't get the money out of the company that did screw up, and figures she could get it out of me.

Obviously they can freeze the accounts because they have gone through the court and done just that. I suggest two things first get a lawyer; you need PROFESSIONAL legal advice. Hopefully they will tell you that you can launch a counter suit for the damage this person has done to your business. Second open another account to use for your business they may try to freeze that but they will have to find out about it first. Keep the balance just high enough to cover the checks written so that if it is frozen you can simply open another account with funds that have not yet been deposited.

What you guys think about debt Settlement/Negotiation Programs?

I have like 40K credit card bills and want an easy and quick way out of them. I also need to keep my credit in a good shape so i am looking for a program to work with to help me to get red of debts. I interviewed a few debt settlement companies ( http://www.cydebt.com/home/homepage.shtm… and they told me that they can reduce my debts to 15K and wouldn't mark my credit. So what is the disadvantage of these companies and why everybody thinks that they're rip off. I also can't understand one part… what's will my creditors do if i don't make any payment?

EASY AND QUICK WAY OUT? LOL

DON'T do debt consolidation. It just moves your debt around. It rolls high interest items AND LOW interest items into the same loan at a mid-range interest rate. It might lower your monthly payments, but that means it will take even LONGER to get out of debt. It also frees up all your lines of credit so you can simply run them up again! Finally, you often have to pay a loan origination fee.

You don't need anyone to do it for you. All they do is negotiate your debts for you and collect a fee. You can do it yourself!

Call all of them and work out a payment plan and try to get your interest lowered or stopped.

Then, make the minimum payments on every one of them. On the lowest dollar value, put all your extra effort toward paying it off. Once it is paid off, then roll that extra money to the next largest balance. Continue this snowball until all your debts are paid off.

You probably need to cut your expenses back to the bare minimum. Get rid of cable, cell phones, internet, etc. Lower your electric bill, gas bill, water bill, etc. Don't eat at a restaurant until your debts are under control. Take a sandwich for lunch. Cancel the gym membership.

Try to increase your income by getting a second job. If you have a car with payments, get rid of it, and buy a good dependable used car for CASH.

Go to the library and get "The Total Money Makeover". Read it and follow it carefully.

Go check out Dave's website as well.
www.daveramsey.com